The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), also known colloquially as "vaccine court," is the federal program created by the 1986 Act (National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act) through which individuals injured by vaccines must seek compensation. This structure represents a fundamental inversion of the normal relationship between government and citizens.
Overview
Created by the 1986 Act, the VICP requires individuals harmed by vaccines to file claims against the Secretary of HHS — not against the vaccine manufacturer. The federal government acts as the defendant, defending pharma companies' products against injured citizens.
The VICP is designed to provide limited compensation for a defined list of vaccine injuries. It is not a standard civil court — claims are decided by special masters under rules designed for this specific program.
Role in Vaccine Policy
The VICP creates an extraordinary structural conflict: the same agency (HHS) that is responsible for vaccine safety is also the named defendant in all vaccine injury cases. This means:
If HHS or its subagencies (CDC, FDA, NIH) publish a study showing a vaccine causes a specific injury, that study could be used against HHS in vaccine court
This creates a powerful institutional disincentive for HHS to conduct or publish studies that find vaccine harms
HHS is thus in the position of simultaneously being responsible for promoting vaccines, assuring their safety, and defending against injury claims — no single entity can ethically fulfill all three roles without compromising at least one
The VICP structurally reverses the typical regulatory relationship: rather than the government protecting citizens from industry, HHS is positioned as the legal defender of vaccine products against injury claims — simultaneously promoting vaccines, overseeing their safety, and serving as the opposing party when citizens allege harm.
Post-VICP Court Claims
After exhausting the VICP, an injured person technically may bring a claim in federal court against the manufacturer — but only if they can prove fraud. The Supreme Court has eliminated all "design defect" claims (see Financial Immunity for Vaccine Makers), making successful post-VICP suits extremely rare.
How does vaccine court work and how much has it paid out in compensation?
The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), known as "vaccine court," has paid over $4.6 billion since 1988 to individuals harmed by vaccines. Claims are filed against the Secretary of HHS — not against the vaccine manufacturer. Cases are decided by special masters under rules specific to this program, not by juries in standard civil court.
Who do you sue in vaccine court — the manufacturer or the government?
You sue the federal government, specifically the Secretary of HHS. The VICP requires all vaccine injury claims to be filed against HHS, not the vaccine manufacturer. This means the same agency responsible for promoting vaccines and assuring their safety is also the named defendant when citizens allege vaccine harm — creating what critics call an irreconcilable conflict of interest.
Can you take a vaccine manufacturer to regular court after vaccine court?
After exhausting the VICP process, an injured person may technically bring a claim in federal court against the manufacturer, but only if they can prove fraud. The Supreme Court's Bruesewitz v. Wyeth decision eliminated all design defect claims against vaccine manufacturers, making successful post-VICP lawsuits extremely rare.
Why does the VICP create a conflict of interest for HHS?
HHS simultaneously promotes vaccines, oversees their safety, and serves as the legal defendant in all vaccine injury cases. If HHS or its subagencies (CDC, FDA, NIH) publish a study showing a vaccine causes a specific injury, that study could be used against HHS in vaccine court. This creates a powerful institutional disincentive for HHS to conduct or publish studies that find vaccine harms.
How is vaccine court different from regular court?
Vaccine court uses special masters instead of juries, applies its own procedural rules, and limits available damages. The injured party must prove their case against the federal government rather than the manufacturer that profited from the vaccine. The program was designed as an alternative to tort litigation, but it shields manufacturers from accountability while providing inadequate compensation and creating perverse incentives against finding harms.
This is the plain-HTML rendering of organizations/VICP.md, served for search
engines, AI crawlers, and accessibility tools. The interactive 3D version
of this wiki lives at vaccine-safety.org.