Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Study — Full Review

The Henry Ford Health System vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study compared health outcomes in thousands of children — here is what the primary source data shows about chronic disease rates between groups.

An unpublished birth cohort study conducted at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit comparing short- and long-term chronic health outcomes between vaccinated (one or more vaccines) and completely unvaccinated children. The study found vaccinated children had 2.5× the overall rate of chronic health conditions and dramatically higher rates of specific disorders. Its findings were suppressed by Henry Ford Health administration before submission for publication.

Background

In early 2017, ICAN sought a scientist the CDC would trust to access the VSD (Vaccine Safety Datalink) for a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated (VvU) study. ICAN CEO Del Bigtree had met Dr. Marcus Zervos — Division Head of Infectious Disease at Henry Ford Health (33,000 team members, 250+ locations), Co-Director of the Center for Emerging and Infectious Diseases at Wayne State University, and a pharma principal investigator. Zervos appeared to be someone the CDC would trust.

Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree flew to Detroit in early 2017. Zervos agreed to a study — but proposed using Henry Ford's own internal health data rather than the VSD, which would have faced hurdles obtaining CDC approval.

Study Design

Full title: "Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study"

Authors: Lois Lamerato, PhD; Abigail Chatfield, MS; Amy Tang, PhD; Marcus Zervos, MD

Affiliation: Henry Ford Health System / Wayne State University School of Medicine

Funding: None (conducted during spare time using existing Henry Ford resources)

Completed: Early 2020 (approximately 3 years after initiation)

Population: 18,468 consecutive children born 2000–2016, enrolled in Henry Ford's Health Alliance Plan (HAP) from birth

Data sources: Medical, clinical, and payer records from HFHS/HAP, supplemented by Michigan immunization registry data. All diagnoses from medical records (not parental recall).

Eligibility: Born and enrolled in HAP for >60 days, with HFHS as primary care system.

Design strength: Retrospective birth cohort capturing all medical encounters from birth through disenrollment (or December 31, 2017) — enabling long-term outcome comparison.

Siri's Two Requests

Siri made two requests at the outset:

1. Publish regardless of outcome — Zervos agreed, looking Siri in the eyes and affirming he was "a man of integrity"

2. Unvaccinated = zero vaccines — not "partially vaccinated," to ensure a clean comparison

Results

Primary Finding

Vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5× increased risk of developing a chronic health condition:

After 10 years of follow-up:

Results Table: Incidence by Condition

ConditionVaccinated (N)Unvaccinated (N)IRR (CI)
Chronic Health Condition (overall)4,7321602.48 (2.12–2.91)
Asthma2,867524.09 (3.11–5.38)
Atopic Disease946232.64 (1.74–3.99)
Autoimmune Disease20126.16 (1.53–24.79)
Neurodevelopmental Disorder1,02996.15 (3.19–11.86)
ADHD2620∞ (could not calculate)
Behavioral Disability1650
Learning Disability650
Tics460
Developmental Delay21933.74 (1.20–11.68)
Speech Disorder46364.02 (1.80–9.00)
Mental Health Disorder34153.50 (1.45–8.46)
Diabetes420
Brain Dysfunction80
Cancer169130.79 (0.45–1.39) — NO signal
Autism2311.16 (0.16–8.62) — not statistically significant

Adjusted Hazard Ratios (multivariate, adjusted for gender, race, birthweight, respiratory distress, birth trauma, prematurity)

ConditionAdjusted HR (CI)P value
Chronic Health Condition2.54 (2.18–2.97)<0.0001
Asthma4.29 (3.26–5.66)<0.0001
Atopic Disease3.03 (2.01–4.57)<0.0001
Autoimmune Disease5.96 (1.44–24.11)0.02
Neurodevelopmental Disorder5.52 (2.91–10.01)<0.0001
Developmental Delay3.28 (1.13–9.56)0.03
Speech Disorder4.47 (2.05–9.74)<0.0001
Cancer0.89 (0.51–1.56)0.72 — no association

Sensitivity analyses (controlling for enrollment duration):

As enrollment minimum increased (excluding children who hadn't been followed long enough to develop conditions), the disparity grew, validating the finding.

Sensitivity analysis (healthcare utilization): When limited to children with at least one healthcare encounter, the association remained: IRR 1.83 (1.56–2.14). Siri notes this is expected — unvaccinated children with serious conditions still sought medical care.

Internal validity check: The study found no association between vaccination and cancer (IRR 0.79) — consistent with the expected absence of a causal relationship. This suggests the findings for other conditions are not artifacts of general health care-seeking behavior differences.

Why It Was Not Published

Despite Zervos's promise to publish regardless of outcome, Henry Ford Health administration blocked submission:

Siri's conclusion: if the study had found vaccinated children were healthier, it would have been published immediately. It was suppressed because its findings contradicted vaccine dogma. The study has been withheld for approximately five years.

Significance

Siri argues the Henry Ford study is potentially the most robust VvU finding ever produced:

The suppression of unfavorable findings creates publication bias: studies confirming vaccine safety are published, while those suggesting harm are blocked — distorting the published evidence base.

See Also

Post-Licensure Safety Monitoring, Childhood Chronic Disease Trends, VSD (Vaccine Safety Datalink), ICAN, CDC


Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Henry Ford vaccinated vs unvaccinated study find?
The study compared 16,511 vaccinated and 1,957 unvaccinated children born 2000-2016 at Henry Ford Health System. Vaccinated children had 2.5 times the overall rate of chronic disease (IRR 2.48, p<0.0001). At 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had chronic conditions versus 17% of unvaccinated. Vaccinated children had 4× the asthma rate, 6× the autoimmune disease rate, and 6× the neurodevelopmental disorder rate. Zero unvaccinated children had ADHD, learning disabilities, tics, or behavioral disabilities.
Why was the Henry Ford study never published?
Henry Ford Health administration blocked submission for publication despite the lead scientists confirming the study was well-designed and worthy of publication. Lead researcher Dr. Zervos told ICAN CEO Del Bigtree the study was well done but he would not publish it because "he didn't want to lose his job." Epidemiologist Lois Lamerato expressed concern that "doctors would feel uncomfortable if these results were published." The study has been withheld for approximately five years.
How was the Henry Ford vaccinated vs unvaccinated study designed?
It was a retrospective birth cohort study using electronic medical records from 18,468 consecutive children. Diagnoses came from medical records, not parental recall. The unvaccinated group received zero vaccines. The study had no external funding, eliminating pharma bias. Multiple sensitivity analyses addressed confounding concerns, and the disparity actually grew as minimum enrollment duration increased — IRR rose from 2.48 overall to 4.09 for children enrolled 5+ years.
Did the Henry Ford study have internal validity checks?
Yes. The study found no association between vaccination and cancer (IRR 0.79, not significant) — consistent with no expected causal relationship. This suggests the findings for other conditions are not artifacts of general healthcare-seeking behavior differences. The autism finding (IRR 1.16) was not statistically significant either. These null results for conditions without expected vaccine links strengthen the positive findings for immune-related conditions.
Who conducted the Henry Ford vaccinated vs unvaccinated study?
The study was conducted by mainstream pro-vaccine scientists at Henry Ford Health System: Lois Lamerato PhD (epidemiologist), Abigail Chatfield MS, Amy Tang PhD (biostatistician), and Marcus Zervos MD (Division Head of Infectious Disease, pharma principal investigator). It was initiated after ICAN's Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree flew to Detroit in early 2017 to propose the research. The scientists conducted it during spare time using existing institutional resources.